Nunavut has released 23 inmates since April 1 due to the COVID-19 pandemic

“If it was safe to release these people, why were they ever detained in the first place?”

As of April 1, 23 Nunavut inmates have been released as part of COVID-19 prevention measures, including from Baffin Correctional Centre, pictured here. Although it’s an important step, it also raises questions around why people are incarcerated in the first place, the chief executive officer of Nunavut Legal Aid says. (File photo)

By Emma Tranter

Since April 1, 23 inmates have been released from Nunavut’s correctional institutions as part of COVID-19 prevention measures.

According to Nunavut’s Department of Justice, its corrections division “reviewed the inmate population and released sentenced inmates who were eligible for early release.”

A total of 12 sentenced inmates were released through that process, while an additional 11 inmates were released through bail reviews “to address the number of remand inmates within our facilities,” the department said in a statement.

“The corrections division has taken steps to identify inmates that were due for early release and are low risk and have released them in order to allow for more space at BCC,” Stephen Mansell, Nunavut’s deputy minister of justice, told Nunatsiaq News.

The 23 inmates were released in response to the public health emergency declared on March 18 because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Any further releases beyond April 1 would be the result of regular procedures, the department said.

As of March 16, Nunavut’s total inmate population was 144. As of May 6, the total population was 116.

Other steps taken by the department to prevent the spread of COVID-19 include suspending visits to Nunavut’s correctional facilities; installing additional hand-sanitizing stations in high-traffic areas; distributing containment kits of gloves, masks, face shields and gowns; increasing food supply orders to ensure facilities are well-stocked; and increasing cleaning protocols.

“We’ve freed up some space in the facilities in order to allow for cleaning and a little more distancing,” Mansell said.

The department could not provide specifics on its plans if someone were to be infected with COVID-19 within the correctional facilities.

“Given the heightened security risks associated with corrections, we cannot provide specific details regarding our individual institutional plans,” the department said.

During the pandemic, inmates have also been given free access to local and long-distance calling, Mansell said.

Inmates who arrive at a correctional facility in Nunavut are screened by a nurse for COVID-19. New inmates are also isolated for 14 days upon intake.

Although new inmates must spend 14 days away from other inmates, that period of isolation is not solitary confinement, Mansell said.

“They are isolated from the other inmates, but they have regular contact with staff. They have access to a television, access to as many phone privileges as they’d like. Snacks are made available as well.… It’s important that people in Nunavut understand this is not 14 days of solitary confinement,” Mansell said.

Justin Piché, a professor of criminology at the University of Ottawa, has been tracking COVID-19 cases at correctional facilities across Canada since the pandemic began.

“At the Joliette Institution for Women, 51 prisoners and 49 staff members got COVID-19.… Some provinces and territories have taken that pretty seriously and have moved in significant ways. We have released almost 5,000 prisoners in Canada since this pandemic began,” Piché said.

But the risk of COVID-19 transmission remains high in Canada’s correctional facilities, Piché said.

“Lockdowns and bad conditions heighten bad situations in prisons,” Piché said.

Piché said he believes the pandemic has shown that those who are most vulnerable to COVID-19 are people who are already marginalized, such as those in long-term care homes and correctional facilities.

“I think what the pandemic has … thrown in our faces now that the people who are most subjected to COVID-19 are those who are actually made vulnerable by our societal structures,” Piché said.

Benson Cowan, chief executive officer at Nunavut Legal Aid, said although early releases and releases through bail hearings are steps forward, they also raise some questions.

“One is, if it was safe to release these people, why were they ever detained in the first place? Over the years, we’ve normalized this system where we maximize the detention of people and we deny people bail and what this has revealed is this just doesn’t have to be the case,” Cowan said.

Cowan said the recent releases are not the result of a change in the law, which further emphasizes the need to re-evaluate why people are not being released earlier in the first place.

“The law was just applied the way it should have been all along. And I think that’s something that we should be paying attention to when we get out of this, because if not, we’re just going to see those pre-trial detention rates increase,” he said.

Cowan said although he hopes the circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic make way for lasting change, Canada’s justice system relies on principles that are out of date in a modern context.

“We still rely on cases and principles that are hundreds of years old and we apply them often unthinkingly to [the] modern context because we think that the risk of change is going to be greater than the risk of the status quo. But we almost always underestimate the risk of the status quo,” Cowan said.

Although the pandemic has caused Nunavut’s justice system to adjust to a new reality, it has also raised questions about the future of access to justice in Nunavut, Cowan said.

“It can’t be, ‘How can we be better prepared for a pandemic?’ It has to be, ‘Are we serving the citizens of this country and the people that need access to justice in a way that is safe and fair and humane?’ And I think we’ve lost the thread of that significantly. Hopefully this will bring it back…. Frankly, we should always be concerned about people in custody. You don’t need a pandemic to be concerned about that,” Cowan said.

Share This Story

(8) Comments:

  1. Posted by No Maximization Here on

    Nunavut sentences offenders in the most relaxed fashion I have ever seen. White Judges are paralyzed with fear that they might be seen as too hard on Inuit, or that the justice system will be seen as son form of colonization. You can see this time and again with these judges being overturned by the Court of appeal. An example is “Nunavut is not a charter free zone” they said when one judge tried to say the Supreme Court of Canada’s judgment doesn’t apply here.
    Release who you can, sure. But to suggest that they shouldn’t be there in the first place is sour grapes for defense lawyers who failed to get what they wanted on sentencing.

  2. Posted by Tommy on

    The Nunavut judicial system is not a Canadian system. The Canadian system is punctual, articulate, and just.

    • Posted by Jordan disagrees on

      The defining case of the contemporary Canadian Injustice system, the Jordan case, would tell us otherwise…

  3. Posted by Roy Donovan on

    Mr. Cowans argument is simplistic in nature. These people were found guilty in a court of law. As stated some were eligible for early release. Detained in the first place statement fails to recognize that there was a crime committed in the first place.

    • Posted by John Paperboy on

      If somebody is released after a bail review, it means they have not been found guilty in a court of law. The point is they were denied bail and are in jail waiting for their trials, but if it’s now been decided that it is safe for them to be released, why were they denied bail in the first place?

  4. Posted by tax payer on

    Let out 11 people who had yet to be sentenced. I am sure the crimes where heinous enough or a repeat offender who is a danger to society and they are let out to walk around.
    I would have rather seen non violent offenders released ex. drug dealers

  5. Posted by Catch and release on

    Catch and release program. Only to be caught again soon near another victim. Maybe the judges and others in the court system are afraid of those they put away.

  6. Posted by Low Risk on

    Low risk does not mean safe. It means low risk. Extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures.

Comments are closed.