Canada’s new Arctic policy could be done by June, minister says

National security, reconciliation added to list of “themes”

Carolyn Bennett, the minister of Crown-Indigenous relations, told the Senate Special Committee on the Arctic last week she hopes the Liberal government’s long-awaited Arctic policy framework can be released by this June. (Screen grab)

By Jim Bell

After more than two years of work, the Liberal government’s new Arctic policy framework won’t be ready for release until after it works out the release date with its “partners,” Carolyn Bennett, the minister of Crown-Indigenous relations, told the Senate Special Committee on the Arctic last week.

“The timeline for the delivery of the new Arctic and northern policy framework will be determined in collaboration with our partners,” Bennett said on Feb. 4, when she appeared before the committee as a witness.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau declared in December 2016 that his government would develop the new Arctic policy—but although they’re getting to look at an early draft, northern governments and Indigenous organizations are still waiting for its completion.

When done, it would replace the 2009 Northern Strategy document and the 2010 Statement on Canada’s Arctic Foreign Policy, both created by Stephen Harper’s Conservative government.

After 16 roundtables in northern communities, two reports from the special ministerial representative, Mary Simon, other consultations, and with a national election looming this Oct. 21, federal officials are still unable to give a firm date for its release.

But when pressed by Senator Mary Coyle, Bennett said “we hope it’s before June.”

Northern Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc is actually now in charge of the Arctic policy framework process, but he couldn’t make it to last week’s Senate committee meeting, so Bennett and her officials ended up fielding questions about it themselves last week.

“Co-development” means many partners

In doing so, she heaped praise on her government’s approach and made use of what’s becoming a common buzzword for her government: “co-development.”

“In the Arctic, co-development or co-management is probably further evolved than anywhere else. But the idea that you would take decisions together—as so many of the Indigenous leaders say, it’s a marriage not a divorce,” Bennett told the committee.

And that list of “partners” is long, which may explain why the Arctic policy process isn’t done yet.

That list now includes the governments of Yukon, Nunavut and the Northwest Territories, as well as First Nations in Yukon, First Nations and Métis in the N.W.T., Inuit organizations, plus Nunavik, Labrador and northern Manitoba.

In addition, even more partners want in on the action.

Wayne Walsh, a director general of the northern strategic policy branch at Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada, said they’re now talking to the NunatuKavut, a group in southern Labrador who claim Inuit ancestry, plus the Innu Nation, also of Labrador.

“We’d like to err on the side of inclusion rather than exclusion,” Walsh said.

Draft copies now circulating

Those stakeholders recently saw a draft copy of the policy framework that has been circulated among them, Walsh said.

“We shared advance copies of the draft with those partners to validate what we’ve found and seen,” he said.

Following that, the government will incorporate suggested changes and release a new draft, Walsh said.

Also, the list of “themes” is growing too, from six to eight.

The original six themes took in Arctic infrastructure; Arctic people and communities; sustainable and diversified economies; Arctic science and Indigenous knowledge; protecting the environment, conserving Arctic biodiversity; and the Arctic in a global context.

National security now a theme

But the policy framework will now also include the theme of reconciliation, and the theme of safety and security, Walsh said.

Bennett confirmed this in response to a question from Senator Patricia Bovey, the deputy chair of the committee, saying the new Arctic policy will cover foreign affairs and national security, given the growing interest in the region shown by countries like Russia and China.

“It’s the reason why, for the first time, that [the Department of] Global Affairs is very much part of this policy. It’s not a domestic policy. It includes our Arctic sovereignty and everything to do with security,” Bennett said.

The issue of Arctic security was underscored earlier this month by news that, for the first time in 30 years, the Russian military will use supersonic jet fighters to patrol the North Pole region.

The Barents Observer of Kirkenes, Norway, quoting a Russian language article published in the newspaper Izvestia, said Russia will use MiG-31BM supersonic jets, which can fly 3,000 kilometres without refuelling, to circumnavigate the North Pole on a regular basis.

“With flights from both east and west, the Russian fighter jets aim at controlling the entire Arctic air space north of mainland Siberia to beyond the North Pole,” the Barents Observer said.

As for the policy itself, it will now include the word “northern” in response to partners who didn’t like the word “Arctic.”

“In terms of the Arctic and northern policy framework, our Yukon partners were uncomfortable with the fact that we started with the Arctic. So it’s now Arctic and northern, because they were not comfortable with Arctic applying to them,” Bennett said.

The new Arctic policy framework is supposed to guide the Canadian government’s Arctic activities until 2030.

Dennis Patterson, the senator for Nunavut and chair of the special committee, said he hopes the committee will be able to contribute to the Arctic policy framework before it’s finished.

Share This Story

(2) Comments:

  1. Posted by Soothsayer on

    Interesting to see the political intelligentsia getting so tangled up in this ideal of casting the most ‘inclusive’ net possible; of course, and how fashionable.

    I predict we’ll end up with a document that has about as much real content as the GN’s ‘Turaaqtavut’ statement; an over written word salad detached from the world it means to describe, and void of any meaningful or useful content.

  2. Posted by Jim MacDonald on

    Russia’s 14 new airfields, supersonic jets, around 16 deep-water ports, a massive number of icebreakers, plus 11 new icebreakers in the works.

    Stacked up against Canada recently purchase of 3 used, mid-size icebreakers for $600 million, to replace 3, pushing close to 40-year-old ice-breakers. One large icebreaker is set to be built, maybe in 10 years.

    Also purchased for $500 million were 2 handfuls of used and for parts, Australian old CF-18s. Jets so old, it’s creating a pilot shortage crisis at the Canadian Air Force, because no one wants to fly them. At one point, considered if non-Canadians would fly them.

    Strange, Canadian government has no problem giving away buckets of cash to the UN and to various foreign governments. That’s $18 billion dollars given away since November 2015. Plus paying over $1 billion over 3 years on “irregular” southern border crossers. while cutting 1.8 billion pension funding to Canadian disabled veterans.

    Serious… Serious problems with Canada’s Arctic/Northern and Canada’s overall sovereignty framework.

Comments are closed.