Nunavut’s new draft land-use plan aims to protect more land
Mining industry also offered more certainty, territorial planning commission says
The Nunavut Planning Commission has released a new draft land-use plan for the territory that aims to win over critics with a compromise: more land will be protected but more leeway will be given to companies seeking to develop mineral claims within the territory’s protected areas.
The commission’s last draft plan, released in 2016 but never adopted, drew criticism from Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. and regional Inuit organizations which were opposed to how it would designate 15 per cent of the territory as protected areas, fearing it would prevent the territory from taking advantage of its mineral wealth.
Under the new plan, 22 per cent of the territory would be protected. But the owners of existing mineral claims would be offered more certainty that they would be able to continue with development.
“Nunavummiut are clear that they want long-term preservation and conservation of the land, wildlife and wildlife habitat, and a stronger, more diversified and stable economy,” said the commission’s executive director, Sharon Ehaloak, at the unveiling of the new plan at the Frobisher Inn in Iqaluit on Thursday.
The new plan categorizes land as limited use, conditional use or mixed use.
Mixed use areas, making up 65 per cent of the territory, are the most relaxed zones with no restrictions, said Jonathan Savoy, planning manager for the commission.
Conditional use areas, making up nine per cent of Nunavut, have requirements that projects must fit into, such as operating during particular seasons to protect sensitive areas such as polar bears den or caribou crossings, Savoy said.
Limited use areas are the most restrictive — they’re most similar to what the commission called a “protected area” in its 2016 draft plan — and prohibit industrial and commercial activity year-round.
The Northwest Territories and Nunavut Chamber of Mines had expressed concern that the earlier draft plan would have prevented the development of existing claims in protected areas.
The new plan, which includes broader provisions for existing projects to be grandfathered in, “provides certainty to the industry,” Ehaloak said.
The commission plans to hold public hearings on the new draft plan in the Kivalliq and Kitikmeot in November and potentially Pond Inlet and Iqaluit in early 2022 if it is granted more money.
After that, the commission may make changes to the draft plan, depending on feedback, and then ask for approval from the federal and Nunavut governments and NTI, which all have to agree for the plan to take effect.
BiM lobying at every angle
I’m sorry, I don’t follow – what is the point of calling it a ‘protected area’ if claims are still allowed to be developed and industrial activity is permitted? What exactly is the area being protected from under this designation?
This seems like a pretty textbook case of regulatory capture.
ever heard of grandfathering? pre agreement claims?
What exactly does the NPC do besides drag their feet and take decades to make a land use plan!? Why is it being led by a Settler? Why not an Inuk?
What is a ‘settler’?
It’s a subtle, low resolution slur meant to make non-indigenous people feel like invaders. My grandparents were settlers, that’s true.. but I was born here.
npc is just like any other organization canada wide; it has its faults and its well oiled as will compare to 80% of NU orgs.
I recently came across an account of an Inuk who started by panning for gold. He and his family panned enough gold in a few summers that they were able to set up a small underground gold mining operation. Within a few more years they had dug enough gold that they were able to set up a large, robotic gold extraction operation that did not use chemicals and did not use blasting.
.
It was all done by Inut, without investors and without borrowing money. While they bought equipment from the south initialy, all the work was done by Inuit and all the money stayed in Nunavut.
.
I think It was a work of fiction.
Too bad it was a work of fiction.