A focus on healing: Kugluktuk’s jail marks 20 years of operation
Ilavut Centre under renovation; warden lauds low recidivism rates at facility
Contractor Doug Wickson, left, and Ken Mulgrew, warden of the Kugluktuk Ilavut Centre, sit in the living room area of the facility in September. The facility is currently under renovation. (Photo by Arty Sarkisian)
Most jails look the same — metal bars, guards, barbed wire and locks. A lot of locks.

Kugluktuk Ilavut Centre, one of Nunavut’s only two open custody jails, is currently under renovation. (Photo by Arty Sarkisian)
But the correctional centre in Kugluktuk is different. So different, that any of its inmates could easily open the door and flee at any time from the bluish building that sits right on the shore of Coronation Gulf. But in 20 years of the facility’s existence, that has almost never happened.
On the anniversary of the Kugluktuk Ilavut Centre, Nunatsiaq News visited the open custody jail, which is one of only two across Nunavut.
It’s currently under renovation, with no people in detention.
The facility is located in the oldest operating building in Kugluktuk. Built in 1960, the one-storey space used to house various federal departments until it became the correctional facility in 2005.
It can accommodate up to 15 male “clients.”
Official corrections lingo used to refer to incarcerated people as “inmates,” said Ken Mulgrew, Ilavut’s warden.
They switched to “residents” as a less degrading term, then dropped it for “clients” in order to avoid a word that might be associated with the legacy of residential schools, he said.
The 3,000-square-foot centre has a living room, kitchen, private meeting room and five identical dorm rooms, where the clients sleep. None of the dorm rooms have locks and the main door to the building doesn’t have a lock either. Clients can walk out of the detention centre if they wish.
Mulgrew, who has been with the facility since it opened on April 2, 2005, didn’t know the exact number of flee attempts the facility has had, but said there is little point in escaping.
Most of the clients are from out of town and wouldn’t have anywhere to go if they did leave.
As well, Ilavut Centre usually gets the most “co-operative” clients in Nunavut.
Before they are transferred to the facility, clients are evaluated to make sure they’re not the kind of people who would want to “test the limits” of the less strict incarceration, Mulgrew said.
That means men convicted of murder or sexual assault or those who have showed aggressive behaviour in other facilities will not end up at Ilavut Centre.
“They usually will be in other facilities and then, maybe, at the tail end of their sentence they would end up here,” Mulgrew said.
The centre has 17 staff including six caseworkers, or “life workers” as Mulgrew calls them.
They help clients with “life-skill based activities” like getting up on time, doing daily chores and following a schedule.
The life workers also help with writing resumes and signing up for mental health or addiction counselling.
The clients’ days vary depending on whether they were able to get a job in the community or not.
If they work at the local grocery store, hamlet or in construction, they will stay at the facility overnight but leave every day to earn a salary like any other workers would.
Whenever they get a paycheque, however, they have to show it to the jail’s financial clerk. In an effort to control contraband, the facility must be aware of all money coming in, Mulgrew said.
Also, the working clients have to pay 10 per cent of their income to the facility as a “rent,” to learn about the responsibilities of paying the bills.
Those who don’t have a job start their days at 8:30 a.m. with a gathering at the main hall where they discuss their agenda for the day. The clients will then help with cleaning and cooking. Some days, they go on trips on the land or by boat.
“The focus is more on healing,” Mulgrew said.
Although it’s hard to measure the exact rate of recidivism — the rate of people reoffending after spending time in jail — in Mulgrew’s experience, the centre’s success rate is higher than in other Nunavut jails.
And the bigger chunk of the clients’ sentence spent in Ilavut correlates to a higher chance they will never end up in jail again, he said.
“Sometimes we’ll just help them for a month, and you can’t do a whole lot of work and counselling and programs, ” he said.
“But if they’re here for three to six months, it makes a big difference.”
Mulgrew didn’t have an exact date when the facility will be able to house clients again.
For the past year, it’s been under renovation with electrical work underway and repainting. There are also new beds for the dorms.
“More of the same, I guess,” Mulgrew said of what he hopes the facility’s next 20 years after the renovation will be like.
“I mean, it’s great to get improvements and changes, but ultimately we’ll just keep going and doing what we’ve been doing.”













As far as I know recidivism rates are not tracked by Justice, though they should be.
Given the tiny volume of ‘clients’ KIC gets I suppose it might be easy to assume the facility is outperforming others on this metric, but that is not an objective statement and is more about the ‘feels’ than anything.
During the 2022/23 Nunavut Legislative Assembly proceedings of the Standing Committee on Oversight of Government Operations and Public Accounts, our MLAs remarked on recidivism rates in Nunavut’
In its response to Written Question 9-5(2), the Department of Justice indicated that
“Nunavut Corrections does not currently have a measure for tracking recidivism.
However, the Department of Justice is currently working on options to define an
appropriate measure for recidivism in Nunavut and to track it going forward.”
“The 2017-2018 annual report of the department’s corrections division indicated that “recidivism will be defined as a return to territorial correctional supervision on a new conviction within two years of completing.” The report also indicates that “corrections does have an electronic system that tracks all numbers related to recidivism rates … in 2018-2019, the division will engage appropriate resources to undertake a project related to recidivism in the territory.”
The Standing Committee recommended “that the Government of Nunavut’s response to this report provide a detailed breakdown of recidivism rates for male adult offenders, female adult offenders, male young offenders and female young offenders for the 2019-2020, 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 fiscal years”.
Well, 2025 is almost over, and I guess the Justice folks have yet to snag a Summer Student or two to go through their electronic system to capture and summarize this data”.
Bravo!
I been here. I do hope they will upgrade the wooden beds man. I couldn’t sleep for months because the wood frame would make loud noises everytime I moved. The halfway home in Iqaluit felt like they got all the funding because they had everything new, including an Xbox one and a tv in the room.
Why were you there?
I don’t feel bad that a bad guy had to sleep on a noisy wooden bed. You were there to be taught and hopefully learn a lesson.
What I would prefer is that the unit be renovated and used for an elders home.
It’s the oldest building in that town, Murph. That means a completely different building code than what a modern elder care facility should be built to. Every doorway in that building would need to be widened in order to properly service the elderly with the equipment they need. And that’s just one single shortcoming of an ancient (by Nunavut standards) building. They need a new building, like the proposal they put in around 2017 asked for.
Day release is good as would be skills training, But it’s truly incompetent not to keep track of recidivism rates. How else can you assess what works and what does not?