Arctic scientist wants to use award money for new protected area
Wayne Pollard has studied Axel Heiberg Island since the 1980s. Now he hopes to see it protected.
Wayne Pollard received the Weston Family Prize for Lifetime Achievement in Northern Research on Dec. 5. (Photo by Sébastien Girard)
Wayne Pollard has been reading Arctic landscapes for more than four decades.
The heaves and slumps and subtle shifts tell a story of the land just emerging from the last ice age, but now being rapidly transformed by a climate crisis.
The McGill University geomorphologist has studied perennial springs that flow freely through permafrost due to high salinity, shifting the landscape as they go.
He was also recruited by the Canadian Space Agency to develop ground-penetrating radar for a Canadian mission to the moon.
And through McGill and Nunavut Arctic College, Pollard has worked to develop science and geography programs with Inuit teachers, and science camps for northern students.
This, and other work, saw Pollard awarded the Weston Family Prize for Lifetime Achievement in Northern Research. The award is worth $100,000 total, including $50,000 for a research fellowship to support his work.
Now, Pollard says, his research is at a transition point of shifting from the systematic study of the environment into something a little more political. Though he is, admittedly, not a political person.
“What I’d like to do with the support from the W. Garfield Weston Foundation is to start looking at trying to set aside specific parcels of land in the Arctic, basically, as wilderness preserves,” Pollard told Nunatsiaq News on Dec. 5, shortly after receiving the award at the ArcticNet Annual Scientific Meeting in Halifax.
Pollard isn’t envisioning a park with open access through tourism, but rather a terrestrial equivalent of the National Marine Conservation Area that was recently designated on Lancaster Sound: Tallurutiup Imanga.
“And I have in mind where I think it would be worthwhile,” he says. “Axel Heiberg Island.”
The island, west of Ellesmere Island, is just south of an interim marine protected area, Tuvaijuittuq.
Axel Heiberg, Pollard says, has many features that make it ideal for the continued scientific monitoring of climate change.
“It has ice caps, glaciers, fiords, it’s got ice-rich permafrost, it’s got viable populations of muskox and caribou. The Peary caribou are largely under severe stress right now,” he says.
“There is so much diversity and many unique features, like the fossil forest. I think it’s an ideal candidate.”
It’s also across a three-kilometre strait from Eureka, says Pollard, offering a point of entry to community members, and southern and northern researchers.
His first step is to enter into discussion with the Government of Nunavut, to see whether there would be an interest in this.
If the interest is there, his next step is to hire someone in the north to spearhead the project.
McGill University has a long history on Axel Heiberg, operating the only research station on the island since 1959.
Pollard became director of the station when he started at the university in 1988.
The aim of his work, and he says he’s got into some trouble for it, is parsing out what changes to the environment are the result of its natural evolution, coming out of an ice age.
One thing he says all current and future researchers should keep in mind is that “No matter where we are in Canada, it’s been less that 20,000 years since there was an ice sheet that was four kilometres thick over our heads.”
But that’s why it’s critical to understand the other side of change, that caused by humans.
One long-standing project of his has been a 20-year helicopter survey of erosion sites. He’s followed the exact same path every year.
“We use an observation technique I learned from caribou studies, counting features within a visual range,” says Pollard.
“It’s essentially a count of different types of thaw-based erosion and their distribution.”
Using this information, along with climate data, his team looks for landscape changes that may have been caused by unusual temperature swings in recent years, including three record-breaking hot summers and two record-breaking cold summers.
“We’re seeing this large variation and a climate that drives this permafrost instability,” he says.
One study site on Axel Heiberg had no evidence of thermal erosion seven or eight years ago. Five years ago, Pollard says, 87 large erosion features were identified there.
Other changes have been noted through logs of wildlife sightings, contributed by every person who visits the research station.
“When we first started working there, it was not unusual to have 15 to 20 caribou walking through the station. Now, we’re lucky to have one or two,” says Pollard. “Yet the muskoxen are everywhere.”
The idea of a protected area, Pollard says, is the end product of 40-odd years working in the Arctic and recognizing the need to have an uninterrupted place to study the impacts of anthropogenic or human-caused change.
And it came from his work with NASA of all groups, in Antarctica, of all places.
His work on perennial springs in the Arctic caught the attention of the space agency.
“The notion of liquid water in an extreme cold polar desert environment was very attractive to an astrobiologist,” says Pollard.
“Even though water is not a requirement for life, it is one of the most common characteristics where life occurs.”
Pollard’s expertise on ice-rich landscapes led him to work with the space agency in the southern polar desert, the Antarctic.
It’s a region unclaimed by a single country, and designated as a place of science and peace.
“If we as a global community can set aside a continent, why can’t we as Canadians set aside an island?” Pollard says.
Axel Heiberg Island falls under the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement and is a part of the Qikiqtani region of Nunavut.
This is critical to its future protection.
With the help of a research associate in the North, Pollard hopes to lay the groundwork for protection of this area with the Government of Nunavut and Inuit organizations.
Together, he sees them drawing out a roadmap to Axel Heiberg’s protection.
“That’s as far as we’ll get in one or two years,” says Pollard. “I think if we sensitize people to the idea, hopefully it will get traction.”




Not only a great person and scientist but also the best linemate I had while playing hockey at McGill.
The caribou are disappearing from Axel Heiberg island and it is not protected. Therefore, it must be protected. If the island is protected, only then can the caribou recover.
The problem with this logic is that it is not like the caribou are actually dodging bulldozers up there. And, caribou were in their highest numbers ever in the Queen Elizabeth Islands at the same time oil and gas exploration was in full swing in the 1970’s. Plus, back then there was an operating mine nearby. How can it be that caribou abundance spiked at the same time there was the most disturbance?
There is no development going on at all on Axel Heiberg besides scientists coming up to study. If any humans are directly contributing to caribou declines, it must be the scientists.
Perhaps it is they that should be banned. Not a hint of that though’; it is much more important that scientists have their real life test tubes to operate in. This is the real reason why he wants this area set aside. If he needs to invoke the development boogeymen to do this, so be it.
Caribou abundance has nothing at all to do with whether or not a piece of this island is ever developed. It has everything to do with the fossil fuels being burned all other the world messing with their weather during calving and early winter.
It is high time this guy stuck to geomorphology and cease the feel good protectionism going on in the Arctic. Get real about reducing carbon emissions instead.
Here is a thought. What is the carbon footprint of George Weston Ltd. and, as such a large Canadian conglomerate, why do they not have a corporate carbon reduction strategy?
Well, when it comes to collars, could be mine or a caribou that’s being tracked. Putuguk makes some sense, especially with regard to the impact climate change is currently having on every Arctic species I know of.
But climate change comes not only from the activities of George Weston companies. All those mining and exploration companies he wants to spare as the cause or trouble – well – bad news. They may have been there years ago but they also made a contribution to what we are putting up with now – and they are still at it, along with mining, oil and gas and the industries that use their products all over the world.
The scientists’ contribution to the problem is minimal. (Even they use airplanes.) But snowmobiles, ATVs and pickup trucks do the same. We are all part of this mess – but some activities far more than others (Alberta Tar Sands?)
It’s a thorny problem. We all have to live and eat, but there are some things we are going to have to learn to live without – like a culture based on the idea of more, more, more. And mines and oil and gas reserves are, unfortunately, we’re more, more, and more gets its start.
Time to say ‘No’ to a lot of things if we want caribou, narwhal, belugas and a lot of other things we value, in our lives!