Cambridge Bay considers using tiny homes to address housing crunch

“The overcrowding situation is pretty dire in the North”

The tiny house pilot project working group gathers for a groundbreaking ceremony in Cambridge Bay last week. (Photo courtesy of Marla Limousin.)

By Elaine Anselmi

The municipality of Cambridge Bay is exploring the possibility of building tiny homes to help ease its housing shortage.

The rationale behind the pilot project is twofold. It could encourage young people to stay and work in their home community by offering an affordable place to live.

And it could also address the lack of housing that roots much deeper in the social issues of northern regions.

“The youth and elder advisory councils said the same thing,” said chief administrative officer Marla Limousin.

“Social issues can be tied back to inadequate housing. There’s suicides because of overcrowding, drug abuse, spousal assault … the overcrowding situation is pretty dire in the North.”

The proposal of a tiny home development for the Kitikmeot hub was written into the 2015-2035 community plan. It suggested a pilot project for tiny homes to offer more diverse types of housing, including non-conventional styles.

“It came really from the mayor’s youth advisory council,” said Limousin.

After taking some time to work it over and develop a concept, the working group on the pilot project is hosting a design meeting with Yellowknife architect Vince Barter.

From there, they’ll figure the shape and configuration of the homes, based on community needs.

Limousin figured they would be around 450 square feet in size, which is on the larger end for a traditional tiny home—usually averaging less than 400 square feet, efficiently laid out to accommodate one or two beds, a kitchen, bathroom and communal space, often all in one area.

There will be specific requirements for the homes in Cambridge Bay, Limousin said—for example, mud rooms to keep the cold out.

“I think once we start working on looking at the architectural program for the houses and start sketching things out, we’ll look at: are we in a box, a circle, a rectangle,” said Limousin.

A site for the development has already been chosen, to the west of the new water treatment plant.

The current idea is to create pods of tiny homes, with a shared central building for laundry, as well as systems for sewer and power. The hope is to have them operate on a microgrid with wind or solar systems.

“It’s a higher cost to install, but lower to operate,” said Limousin. “We’re in partnership with Polar Knowledge on that piece and they’re working with us as advisors here in the community.”

The cost of the tiny homes will be between $150,000 and $200,000 each, but what ownership will look like is still being determined.

By comparison, the cost to build a single public housing unit is $500,000, according to a 2016 Nunavut Housing Corp. report, while a five-plex costs $2.2 million.

“Is it a not-for profit, is it a development corporation, is it a mixture of private home ownership and not-for-profit?” said Limousin.

“Community ownership is certainly really important, but what happens, and what I don’t want to happen, is, say I buy a unit in there for $150,000 and flip it for $270,000. We want it to stay in the not-for-profit housing model.”

This keeps the homes within reach of a range of residents, from people transitioning out of shelters to those young people returning to the community, wanting to stay and work.

“They can’t enter into the housing market because it’s not affordable,” said Limousin. “Here is somewhere they can build equity in a small home.”

Once all of these pieces are in place, including design and means of construction, a model for ownership of the units and powering them, Limousin said they’ll be able to start soliciting funding for the project. Until then, funding from Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada has been provided for the project’s design and planning.

If this pilot project is a success, Limousin said, and a tiny home model is developed that’s culturally appropriate, robust enough for the northern clime and affordable, it could be replicated across the North.

Share This Story

(12) Comments:

  1. Posted by Good work on

    This is cool, I’ve always imagined i’d end up in one of these someday. Happily so as long as there’s a whisky cabinet built in somewhere. Congratulations to the people involved for thinking outside the old box!

  2. Posted by Hunter on

    Back to the Match box days

  3. Posted by Oscare on

    Why didnt they get prefab homes that sit on trailers. A company in Edmonton builds them. They can be built to Arctic climate standards which I have seen first hand. They can be outfitted to accept a water tank n sewage tank systems.

    • Posted by Putuguk on

      The price, quality and convenience advantages of going pre-fab are negated in the Arctic by transportation costs. Per-fab houses are much higher in volume to ship down to the coast compared with house construction materials. Per-fab houses complete with roofs are also not stack-able, like sea cans.

      Barging costs could easily double the overall cost of a unit as compared to what is advertised in Alberta.

      If you are in the south any length of time, you will see pre-fab house components on one of the highways being brought to a new owner’s lot. Much lower trucking costs from a central manufacturing plant makes this housing option the most attractive for many.

      Yet again another reason why we need a road into Nunavut.

      • Posted by David on

        Lots of companies are making pre fabs out of sea cans today. I am sure you could find some help here, maybe not a solution, but help.

  4. Posted by Bare Naked Owl on

    You could build a 12X12 shack under 3 grand and build one’s life back to self-efficiency…don’t wait for someone to make it for you.

    • Posted by Modernity beckons on

      Yea right, a 12 x 12 shack made from spare wood lying around or, what? I’d rather leave it to a professional. This is what specialization is all about.

  5. Posted by That should be some little house! on

    While the concept is interesting, paying almost $450 per square foot based on the $200,000 price seems outrageous and then add in the equity lease of how much?

  6. Posted by Malaya on

    Megan will fix this. Now that we have a represantative from Kitikmeot

    • Posted by Resident on

      What about this makes you think Megan needs to get involved? She needs to focus on winning the election first. But even after it isn’t the duty of an MP to meddle in local community projects just to say you’ve done something. No what she, Leona, and whoever the NDP and Greens choose, need to do is to encourage more communities like Cambridge Bay to keep up the good work they have been doing!

      • Posted by Jeff on

        MPL will fix all that ails NU. Yay!! 😉

  7. Posted by Bucky Fuller on

    Just let life-long residents have a 50 year land lease for $1 per year. Let them build their own tiny house and expand it as they have the time, money and need. So much simpler.

    Offer some training in carpentry, plumbing and basic wiring. People will figure it out. It’s not rocket science.

Comments are closed.