Low earth orbit satellites offer best chance for better broadband, reader says
Consultant responds to article on Nunavut’s internet failures
I am responding to the article “The connected territory? Nunavut still waits” published on April 1, 2019 in the Nunatsiaq News. I would like to comment from the perspective of a former chief information officer of the Government of Nunavut (the first one actually) and as one of the founders of Nunavut Broadband.
First, before the GN existed (1996) the previous Government of the Northwest Territories (which included Nunavut until 1999) signed an agreement with Northwestel to deliver a network service to all communities in the N.W.T.
This project overlapped with the creation of Nunavut and that network was called the “Ardicom Network.” It was originally intended to serve consumers, businesses and government.
When it finally rolled out, governments benefited by receiving the best prices while businesses and consumers were simply unable to afford the prices charged by Northwestel. Jim Bell references this network in his article.
Second, as an independent consultant, I created Nunavut Broadband Development Corp. in 2003 for the purpose of developing a business plan that would enable broadband in every Nunavut community for consumers and businesses. We obtained initial funding from the federal government, submitted our plan, and won the federal investment needed to launch what became the Qiniq network serving all 25 communities.
Through a competitive request-for-proposal process we selected SSi Micro to implement the initial rollout in every community in 2005. Since then SSi and the Government of Canada have invested more than $150 million in Qiniq infrastructure, satellite services and subsidies for Nunavut consumers.
Without this significant investment the basic Qiniq service, now at $80 per month, would cost at least $300 per month.
Third, all suppliers of communications in Nunavut operate using one or more of three satellites operated by Telesat as the backbone connecting Nunavut with the south.
No other supplier has satellites covering all of Nunavut. Jim Bell references the single incident in the last two decades where one of these satellites malfunctioned for a period of 16 hours. This is an incredibly good record!
During the same two decades the fibre serving Yellowknife and Whitehorse was likely broken dozens of times, with time to repair usually measured in hours and sometimes days.
In the event that undersea fibre reaches Nunavut, then any fibre breaks under the ice could be catastrophic—with time to repair measured in months.
Satellite is expensive, and the current geo-stationary satellites have a high latency time compared to fibre, but on up-time, satellite will always beat fibre and microwave. Moreover, fibre will serve only a few preferred communities with the rest left to the satellite issues we know and hate.
Fourth, both Northwestel and SSi Micro have state of the art “last mile” services installed in Nunavut for broadband and mobile voice (cell phones). SSi covers every community with these latest “last mile” services at the same price point, with no long distance charges within Nunavut.
But both suppliers and the GN are constrained by the lack of backbone capacity connecting to the south. A new satellite (T19) was launched last fall, but the added new capacity on that satellite is not available to all service providers unless additional equipment is installed. Forecasts also show that the new capacity, when connected to the existing users, is not sufficient beyond the end of 2019.
Finally, what’s the solution? Watch the progress of LEO (Low Earth Orbit) satellite projects. Telesat, SpaceX and OneWeb are all testing LEO.
Two of these projects will serve the North, those being Telesat and OneWeb. LEO projects involve hundreds of satellites orbiting very close to the Earth (400-1,000 kilometers) where there are always several satellites visible over any point on our planet.
Each satellite moves across the sky in several minutes. Initially the ground equipment will be small, tracking antennas protected in radomes. The cost for ground equipment per community will be more than the current satellite antennas.
But eventually, the ground equipment will be a flat panel that electronically tracks the best connection just like a cellphone in a moving car tracks and connects to the best cell tower. LEO networks will provide terabits of overall capacity on the backbone with latency lower than fibre.
Unfortunately, we have to survive for three more years with the current congested backbone, absent new capacity coming on board. Of course, fibre should be installed when new north-south roads or power lines are installed (example: the proposed power project from Manitoba to western Hudson Bay communities).
Otherwise, undersea fibre should be avoided when installed under the ice where the sea bottom is prone to ice damage or to undersea landslides. To keep current on this subject Google “LEO satellites” and follow the links.
David E. Smith
Email your letters to [email protected]
Nunatsiaq News welcomes letters to the editor. But we are under no obligation to publish any given letter at any given time.
In our print edition, we usually print letters on a first-come, first-served, space-available basis. In our online edition, we usually print letters as soon as we are able to prepare them for publication.
All letters are edited for length, grammar, punctuation, spelling, taste and libel. You may withhold your name by request, but we must know who you are before we publish your letter.
I still want fiber optics in Kivalliq from Manitoba. I am so sick and tired of qiniq’s low data and super expensive service…you’re just money grabber
I have to disagree with you, Fiber is the way to go, what is the life of a low orbiting sat?
Not all of the communities can hook up to fiber but a lot of them can and it would make the other communities internet faster with larger communities not connected to the same broadband. Need to look a little further and see that fiber is the way to go.
Nunavik is working towards connecting their communities with fiber, Greenland is connected, most of the arctic is already connected except Canada. We are so far behind with other northern countries.
No more satellites please PERIOD.
I think the perfect solution is a combination of both.
I have never heard of undersea fibre cables being damaged by either rock slides or sea ice. I have heard anecdotal stories of deliberate disruption of subsea cables by submarines. Given that undersea fibre has been around for over a decade now one would assume that they would have figured this out and found a method to protect them. That being said the best mix probably low earth satellite and fibre. Now if we can only convince somebody to invest!