Ottawa receives Nutrition North external review

Aluki Kotierk’s review of food subsidy program was almost two months late with no explanation

Aluki Kotierk, second from right, a special representative to the minister of northern affairs, submitted an external review of the Nutrition North food subsidy to the federal government Monday — nearly two months after it was due, a government official says. Kotierk was seen Monday with Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree, left, Nunavut MP Lori Idlout and former Nunavut premier Paul Okalik at the Tapiriit event Monday night in Ottawa. (Photo by Jeff Pelletier)

By Jorge Antunes

Nearly two months after an external review of the Nutrition North food subsidy program was due, the federal government says it received that report on Monday from its special representative Aluki Kotierk.

“I can confirm that Minister [Rebecca] Chartrand received the submission from the ministerial special representative on Nutrition North Canada on Monday which is currently being reviewed,” Erika Lashbrook Knutson, press secretary to Northern Affairs Minister Rebecca Chartrand said in an email on Wednesday.

The Nutrition North program is the responsibility of the federal Department of Northern Affairs.

It is unclear why the review was delayed for almost two months, but Chartrand’s press secretary said Kotierk told the government she would not bill the government for her work.

“As [Kotierk] provided her review after the deadline had passed, she indicated in her submission that she would not be sending an invoice,” Lashbrook Knutson said.

Former Northern Affairs Minister Dan Vandal first announced the review in October 2024 to address years of complaints about the program. Critics said it was not meeting the needs of northerners as they faced rising food prices.

The program subsidizes the cost of food and other essentials in 124 northern communities, including all of Nunavut and Nunavik.

In February 2025, then Northern Affairs Minister Gary Anandasangaree announced the appointment of Kotierk, a former Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. president, as a ministerial special representative to oversee the external review.

In March, Chartrand told Nunatsiaq News the review was due at the end of that month. That deadline came and went with no sign of Kotierk or the review.

Since then, Nunatsiaq News has asked Chartrand’s office for updates on the status of the report.

To date, Northern Affairs has been invoiced $15,000 in travel expenses for Kotierk’s work. As of April, Kotierk had not invoiced the department for compensation.

Share This Story

(9) Comments:

  1. Posted by Make Iqaluit Great Again on

    “As Kotierk provided her review after the deadline had passed, she indicated in her submission that she would not be submitting an invoice”. How ridiculous!!! This doesn’t come close to passing the smell test!! Anyone with any life experience in the world knows that this doesn’t add up. Let’s see this brilliant report that Ms. Kotierk spent weeks preparing for free because she missed the deadline….. Why does government treat like fools and think we are so dumb that we can be sold on these lines???

    55
    7
    • Posted by Let’s See The Goods on

      They should publish the report in its entirety.

  2. Posted by Articrick on

    Did it take her 2 months to complete? You are a farce and an embarrassment to all Inuit, Aluki

    53
    11
  3. Posted by Blank page on

    If she’s not charging for it, it’s probably just a blank piece of paper or a summary of already known food statistics online.

    I’ll wait to actually hold judgement until we see it but I have a feeling we won’t see it because it’s just an incomplete “report”.

    35
    5
  4. Posted by Putting this out there on

    Oh no Aluki you are a smart person you should know better. Unless the reporting of this is just done poorly then really I feel this means one of two things.
    1. You really didn’t do anything and what you submitted it is just so bad you know you dont deserve to get paid… which that’s a shame, someone else could have done the job to get paid (lots of people need jobs)
    2. It was done to the level you should be capable of but you were paid off by someone else to help slant it towards them getting more money and you know it will not actually help us so you feel guilt in also billing for the work… and that would be a shame.

    10
    4
  5. Posted by Follow the Money on

    Remember – You get what you pay for.

    Me thinks the 10’s of thousands on Northerners who were expecting relief from the insufferable cost of living in the north, through a revised and revitalized Nutrition North program, will continue to fall behind in their purchase power.

    11
    4
  6. Posted by Mass Formation on

    LOL… told the government she would not bill the government for her work.

    But seemily it’s more important to be happy in a photo taken with Nunavut floor crosser and other controlling Liberal MP.

    A thousand repeating word photo…who cares,
    while Canada continues being destroyed from within.

    11
    7
    • Posted by S on

      Thanks, Mass Formation

      There is no report, for several reasons:

      In one way, there is nothing to report on. Food prices in Nunavut are crazy high. That goes without saying, which is to say, it isn’t something to report on.

      That food prices are high because of extra costs: transportation, storage, wastage, reduced economies of scale, compromised labor, elevated construction and maintenance costs, …. goes without saying. It isn’t something to report on.

      However, there are many subtle and blatant elements and factors that are worth identifying in those costs that I mentioned and in other nutrition components including many facets of consumer behavior. If there gad been an open competition for the investigation and I had been appointed to do the analysis of Northern Nutrition then there would be a historic and meaningful report.

      That Aluki Koteirk was appointed to do the analysis says everything that needs to be said. With 100% certainty she has zero ability to analyse Nutrition North…. or anything else. For Aluki, Nutrition North isn’t something to report on

      9
      1
  7. Posted by Myohmy on

    Inuit living in southern hubs like Montreal,Ottawa,and western cities know the living costs. To off sqt vosts. No choice but to move to a provincial city anywhere else than in Nunavut is almost (4) four times cheaper .

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*