Q&A: U.S. diplomat talks Arctic security, climate change in visit to Nunavut
Consul general Danielle Monosson says she came to share America’s priorities for Arctic, and to learn from locals
United States consul general Danielle Monosson visited Nunavut for the first time. This October, the United States released its national strategy for the Arctic, which Monosson has come to spread awareness about and engage with Nunavummiut. (Photo by David Lochead)
United States consul general Danielle Monosson made her first trip to Nunavut recently, with a visit to Iqaluit in late October.
The purpose was to raise awareness about the United States’ release of its national strategy for the Arctic region for the next 10 years, and to meet the people of the territory, Monosson said.
The strategy has four pillars: Arctic security; resilience against climate change; economic development in the Arctic; and international co-operation.
During her diplomatic visit, Monosson spoke with Nunatsiaq News about the relationship the United States can have with Canada, and specifically with Nunavut.
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
Nunatsiaq News: What role does the United States see itself having in smaller communities in the Canadian Arctic?
Monosson: Since it is Canada’s territory, we see ourselves having a complementary and supportive role, such as through north-to-north partnerships with Alaska. That could mean bringing someone from Alaska here, or exchanging best practices.
We also want to get to know Nunavummiut, because while working between Ottawa and Washington is important, it is vital to get the perspective of the people who actually live in the North.
NN: What about international co-operation in the Arctic? How does that continue in organizations such as the Arctic Council, when Russia has acted so aggressively with its invasion of Ukraine?
Monosson: When it comes to Russia, it is virtually impossible to co-operate with them in most arenas, including the Arctic. That being said, one of the goals in the United States’ new Arctic strategy is that our country wants to ensure the existing institutions in the Arctic are the ones that manage the region, especially with increasing Arctic interest globally.
NN: With the United States having two increasingly different political parties with differing world views in the presidency recently, what kind of consistency can Canadians expect when it comes to the United States’ approach to the Arctic?
Monosson: No matter who is sitting in the White House, Arctic engagement is a priority. We’re always going to want to co-operate closely with Canada because we have an incredible alliance and friendship. I think there’s more consistency than difference, such as in interest in supply chains, critical minerals, and working with local communities.
I don’t disagree there can be changes [when administrations change]. But in the long run, it’s a consistent and reliable relationship.
NN: What partnership does the United States see with Canada when it comes to climate change in the Arctic?
Monosson: Climate change is complex, and we’re looking to work together to get communities more resilient infrastructure and long-term solutions. The United States has done pilot projects on climate change and my country is looking for me to see what options and opportunities there are for that type of work in Nunavut.
NN: Is there anything else you would like to add?
Monosson: I hope to come again and see more of the communities. I’m eager to learn from Nunavummiut. I want to share my country’s strategic priorities, but I don’t want to tell people what to do. I want to learn from people what is the best way we can work together.
Quality of life is much higher in Nunavut than isolated Alaskan native villages except for those that get money from north slope oil royalties.
USA doesn’t even try to care about indigenous people.
How could the US Federal or State Governments “care” more about Inuit in remote Alaska villages not receiving income under a respective agreement for oil royalties?
The US has no friends only interests it had been stated so by Henry Kissenger, top official there years ago. Nothing has changed.
Friends often have the same interests. NORAD was important for friends. Good trade agreements are important for friends. Defence co-operation is what friends do. I work with veterans like my own father, US WWII vet. Stand with me at Pointe du Hoc near where 60,000 Americans stormed Normandy and millions more Americans sacrificed what they could. Find a Frenchman there and ask him if the US has “only interests, no friends.”
Ben Norton is a news reporter publishing mainly South and Central America’s affairs. Here is what he has found about problems in Ecuador (of which the US is the instigator)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SASR9NXIQpU
https://thegrayzone.com/2022/10/29/dennis-kucinich-where-are-the-pro-peace-democrats/
The Grayzone website is doing the reporting that others are skimming over. It’s a Pro Peace outlook which is a big No No to most of what we hear and read, In wars there are no winners, ask any veteran of a war zone experience,
The US has only one political party, the Plutocrats. The Plutocrats have two electoral wings, the Democrats and the Republicans. It does not matter to the Plutocrats which wing wins any election. The two electoral wings serve to distract the voters.
.
The ancient Romans used “bread and circuses” to control the people. In the US, electoral politics is the circus. Those elected politicians then provide the bread in the form of make-work projects in their electoral districts.
.
Don’t pay attention to the man behind the curtain.
.
The one big advantage of actual electoral politics is that, if someone goes rogue, he or she can be “voted out” at the next election. They have a way out with their ill-gotten gains. With US-style electoral politics there is far less “collateral damage” than with a totalitarian leader, who ends up having to fight for his life.
.
Unfortunately, the US Plutocrats have insisted on installing totalitarian leaders throughout much of the rest of the world for the past 50 years.