Some Inukjuak residents remain concerned about hydro project

“We rely on the river a great deal and rely on the sea ice for our survival, for food”

Protesters gather at the site of the Innavik Hydro Project outside Inukjuak, Nunavik, on Oct. 20. (Photo by Deseray Cumberbatch)

By Elaine Anselmi

Shortly after Thanksgiving, 86 community members gathered in Inukjuak to share their concerns about the hydroelectric dam project underway at the edge of town.

The Innavik Hydro Project is a partnership between Pituvik Landholding Corp. and Innergex, a southern renewable energies engineering firm. Though iterations of the project have been on the books since 2008, the final 7.5-megawatt run-of-the-river dam passed environmental assessment in August.

Site preparation for the project began this fall, with construction set to start in spring 2020.

At the two-hour meeting organized by concerned community members on Oct. 15, the consensus was that Inukjuamiut were not properly informed or consulted about the dam, said Charlie Nowkawalk.

The Kativik Environmental Quality Commission held public hearings on the Innavik project in Inukjuak in March. Its final report and decision were released in July, authorizing the project with 10 conditions.

In its report, the commission notes that the March hearings saw 40 people show up over the course of two meetings on March 11. A call-in session was broadcast on the radio on March 12. The conditions the commission laid out were largely in response to concerns heard from community members.

Those behind Innavik have since gone on the radio to discuss the details of the project, but Nowkawalk said the questions of the people opposed to the project go unanswered.

Nowkawalk, along with Deseray Cumberbatch and Billy Palliser, was nominated by those at the meeting to lead the resistance against the hydroelectric project.

Since that meeting, the group also held a protest at the dam site on Oct. 20 and continues to gather the concerns of the community.

Eric Atagotaaluk, president of Pituvik, said the landholding corporation is working on a plan to address the concerns of community members. With a new board just elected last month, they’re still figuring out what exactly that response will be.

But he said more community sessions are being planned in the near future.

The impact the dam will have on the Inukjuak River and the ecosystem it supports has people worried. “We rely on the river a great deal and rely on the sea ice for our survival, for food,” said Palliser.

Nowkawalk said that Innavik isn’t planning to clear vegetation around the flooded area. That raises concerns that decomposing vegetation could release mercury into the water.

Atagotaaluk said, in an emailed response to Nunatsiaq News, that no such clearing was planned as there are no trees upstream of the facility and experts warned against clearing the existing vegetation in the flooded area.

But Cumberbatch said that mercury has already been found in the area’s wildlife. “Animals like snow owls, lemmings and muskrat have mercury here,” said Cumberbatch. “So, it’s in our tundra.”

Fish monitoring has already begun to establish baseline levels of mercury in the river.

Atagotaaluk said that several elements of the Innavik project indicate that there is not a significant risk of increased mercury levels in fish. That’s largely because the design of the dam, being a “run-of-river” project, does not have a large reservoir of standing water.

Approximately 65 hectares, or just over half a square kilometre, will be flooded for the dam, adding to the existing course of the river.

The areas that are flooded are mainly bedrock, rather than soil, Atagotaaluk said, which he said lowers the risk of mercury contamination.

The monitoring program that began pre-construction is continuing, looking for any potential changes in mercury concentrations in fish. “Communication will be maintained with the community if fish consumption guidelines are to be updated,” said Atagotaaluk.

A spillway is being built for fish migration next to the dam, as well as new spawning beds to replace those lost in the dam’s development. But residents opposed to the project are still concerned about how it could alter the fish population.

“I don’t know why the impact assessment review said the waterfall couldn’t be passed [by fish] because traditional ecological knowledge opposes that,” said Palliser. “Traditional ecological knowledge says they do go over the falls.”

There is also the issue of the 2010 referendum that allowed the dam project to move forward. Proponents set their own target of a 75 per cent response rate on the question of whether or not to build the dam. Only 71.6 per cent of eligible voters cast a ballot.

At the time, Atagotaaluk said they set the 75 per cent target for themselves, wanting to see a high turnout. But he said above 70 per cent was close enough to get a fair sampling of opinions. Of those who voted, 83 per cent were in favour of dam construction.

Nonetheless, some in the 1,700-person community remain hesitant.

“We want to have a fair and respectful discussion and a find a solution,” Nowkawalk said.

The group also noted that there are other ways to decrease carbon emissions that don’t require damming the river. Wind turbines are one example that have been used in Nunavik. Quaqtaq is considering a turbine installation and two are installed at Raglan Mine.

“My main argument is that I want to preserve the fresh water as it is because it is our main basic need, it’s naturally rich and it’s priceless,” said Cumberbatch.

“A lot of people know the earth has so much water but it’s not getting any cleaner, so the fresh water is something that I would like to preserve and keep as natural as possible.”

Share This Story

(6) Comments:

  1. Posted by Yes Inukjuamiut, you have your human and rights to complaint on

    Yes, Inukjuamiut, you have human rights and jbnqa rights to complaint VS Hydro Quebec, they better be ready to compensate in any case of damaging your water access, especially for to preserve fresh water.

    There are children to consider, they are growing and, one day, your child(ren) will be responsible of your community for the sake of preserve fresh water.

    At least request for water testing every week, many more to consider, not just to say yes.

  2. Posted by Please say no! on

    There is no way that there will be no damage if it goes ahead. There will be permanent, irreversible damage from the get go. What do those money hungry family men think they will get out of? New business venture?
    It will profit only few, Inukjuamiut! The money goes only to a couple of go-getters.

  3. Posted by Janimarik on

    Inukjuak river and it’s whole valley towards inland provides huge amount of resources for all wildlife especially for Inuit. Negative impacts will affect *not just Inukjuamiut*. Humans are stupid, they think they are so smart when in fact, they are the dumbest creatures in planet

  4. Posted by Janimarik on

    according to the law of Inuit, this has to be one of many illegal activities going on that dates Way back since 1975…
    So illegal that it can be brought up front to the court of supreme, history repeats itself! People of the land shall rise soon enough!

  5. Posted by Lots of nice ATVs in that picture on

    Am I reading this right?

    The roughly 13% (205) of the town that opposed this venture back in 2010 and 86 that protest it now would rather scuttle a hydroelectric dam that passed an Environmental Impact Assessment and is due to begin construction imminently, and therefore continue to use a diesel plant while they start from scratch, because they are worried about keeping the land and water clean.

    I’ve read this paper online for ~5 years and never felt the urge to comment before but… wow.

  6. Posted by Janimarik on

    Les gens d’Inukjuaq qui sont pour ce projet “ont une fausse conception de la réalité” ce qui va se produire dans le future, le reste de la population autour sont assez alerte des dommages qui va se produire, alors qu’il faut réagir aussi vite que le development de l’homme qui entrain de le détruire

Comments are closed.