Inuit leader at COP26 calls for Arctic shipping to be cleaned up

Lisa Koperqualuk calls for ban on the use of black carbon

Lisa Koperqualuk, vice-president of the Inuit Circumpolar Council, speaks last week at COP26 in Glasgow, Scotland, about the need to transition away from burning heavy fuel oil in Arctic shipping. (Photo courtesy of Inuit Circumpolar Council)

By David Lochead

As representatives from countries and organizations around the world have descended into Glasgow, Scotland, to address climate change, Lisa Koperqualuk took to the stage at the summit to speak about an issue that particularly affects the Canadian Arctic: black carbon.

Koperqualuk is a vice-president of the Inuit Circumpolar Council, or ICC, and one of the representatives from the organization at the United Nations 26th annual conference on climate change, known as COP26.

“We can take days and days to actually sit down together and talk about it, that’s how important [black carbon discussion] is,” Koperqualuk said in her speech.

Black carbon – also known as soot – is emitted by ships operating in the Arctic that burn heavy fuel oil. It increases the temperature of the air surrounding it, and when it settles on ice, it makes the ice darker and less reflective, which in turn makes it melt faster.

Predictions that Arctic shipping could increase suggest this problem could grow.

Koperqualuk said she wants stronger measures in place to ban the use of heavy fuel oils used by ships going through the Arctic. Currently, the International Maritime Organization, or IMO, has approved a phased-in ban on the use of heavy fuel oil in the Arctic that would fully come into place in 2029.

Both the Nunavut and federal governments have opposed an immediate ban on the use of heavy fuel oil in Arctic waters, saying that such a ban would increase the cost of living in remote communities that depend on goods being delivered by sealift. One study concluded that the average Nunavut household would pay an additional $1,400 a year if the fuel were banned.

But the ICC and conservation groups say that a ban that’s phased in by 2029 is too weak.

In an email to Nunatsiaq News, Koperqualuk said the cost of transitioning to cleaner shipping fuels must not be put on communities. A transition fund for Arctic shipping established by the federal government is the best solution, she said, adding that investing $15 million over three years should be enough to offset any increased costs.

At a COP26 event Nov. 5 that focused on black carbon emissions in the Arctic, Koperqualuk described these challenges and spoke of the need to include Inuit in decision-making for shipping decisions in the Arctic.

“We’re speaking out on behalf of Inuit and saying, ‘Come on, stop using black carbon,’” Koperqualuk said.

She said the purpose of this speech was to raise awareness about who Inuit are, where they live and the impact black carbon can make on daily life in the Canadian Arctic.

“It can impact our culture and our language,” Koperqualuk said.

Koperqualuk said her organization made another step forward in its advocacy efforts last week, when the ICC became the first Indigenous organization to receive consultatory status with the IMO. This development will help the ICC be more involved in the decision-making for the shipping in the Inuit homeland.

“We can move forward in engaging with the IMO and have our voice heard,” she said.

COP26 runs until Nov. 12.

Share This Story

(3) Comments:

  1. Posted by Nattering Nabob on

    Does the issue around black coal need to be connected to “language and culture”? It’s hard not to feel this is a little over reach.

    11
    1
    • Posted by iThink on

      Of course it is, these terms are meant to invoke a deep visceral response, or so it is imagined.

      Alternately, it’s just as likely people tire and eventually tune out these invocations, which become cliches through their overuse.

  2. Posted by Andy on

    Don’t forget to mention the power plants in Nunavut. Fossil oil and the generators have to be phased out. Alternative power solutions need to be further researched and developed. A hydro dam was suggested for Iqaluit in 2013, but the QIA did not provide permissions to build on the proposed land because of conflicts between the Kimmirut – Iqaluit trail and the fishing area. In 2016 the project was indefinitely put on hold because of the significant estimated cost of half a billion. What a price tag for a healthy environment. Power alternatives like wind, solar, tidal energy could maybe the best choice for smaller communities, but maybe not. Eventually, the Diesel has to go

Comments are closed.