Nunavut’s fourth COVID-19 case confirmed in Arviat

Infected individual spent two weeks in Winnipeg isolation hub

Nunavut’s newest case of COVID-19 has been confirmed in Arviat. (File image)

By Dustin Patar

There is a new case of COVID-19 in Nunavut, this time in the Kivalliq community of Arviat, says Nunavut’s chief public health officer, Dr. Michael Patterson.

“This person returned to Arviat after spending two weeks in one of the isolation hubs in Winnipeg and roughly seven days after returning home they became ill and presented to the health centre,” Patterson said during a press conference on Friday morning, Nov. 13.

As the individual’s symptoms worsened during the following two to three days, they were medevaced to Winnipeg.

At that time, it was not expected that the individual had COVID, Patterson said. “The presentation was atypical.”

It wasn’t until the patient arrived in Winnipeg that they were tested, with the results being received on Nov. 12.

The individual is now out of the hospital and doing well, Patterson said.

Although the individual is not in the community, contact tracing has begun in Arviat and a rapid response team is on standby to support that effort should it become necessary.

At the same time, Patterson confirmed that the positive case in Rankin Inlet had a “similar history.” He also said that the individuals in Sanikiluaq also went through the isolation hubs, though those cases may have other equally plausible explanations, such as the rare case when individuals who isolate together transmit the virus to each other while in quarantine.

“While the common travel history is concerning, we are not yet able to say with certainty how these individuals were exposed to COVID-19,” Patterson said.

“It’s extremely rare to have an incubation period longer than 14 days, that’s why the worldwide accepted standard is 14 days. So to have two people … take 21 days to show symptoms is unheard of.”

Patterson said this likely means that the individual came into contact with the virus at the end of their isolation or after it.

“For the majority of people, the symptoms show up within that four or five to eight-day period after exposure.”

Patterson said that the Department of Health is looking into how this exposure happened, and if they find that it’s related to protocols or policies that can be changed, they will address that.

Patterson had previously declined to release information on the travel history of any of the positive cases.

“We felt with one case we wanted to take the time to sort out what was going on and not make inappropriate or random decisions,” Patterson said.

“But with two cases it raises the concern that there will be more COVID in the regions, so we felt we needed to act before we got all the information.”

Kivalliq under lockdown

Beginning Sunday, Nov. 15, all travel between Kivalliq communities will be restricted, with the exception of cargo and emergency travel.

Anyone who has a critical need to travel out to the Kivalliq after Sunday must apply for a travel authorization letter by writing to

Travellers from outside the Kivalliq who are travelling through the region will still be allowed.

Those travellers staying in the region for longer than 24 hours will be subject to the travel restrictions.

Patterson said that Kivalliq residents currently in isolation hubs will have the choice to either return to their communities or remain in the hubs for a “little bit longer” to see what happens.

Similar to previous restrictions implemented in other communities affected by COVID-19, hunters may continue to leave their communities but cannot travel to any other community or populated area.

This GN poster outlines the difference between self-monitoring and isolation.

Today’s announcement also says that, across the Kivalliq region, only essential services are to remain open, with grocery stores implementing reduced hours.

As well, indoor gatherings are no longer permitted, and all outdoor gatherings are limited to five people or fewer.

Kivalliq residents are required to wear a mask while outside their homes, stay at home as much as possible and limit contact with others, including family members not living in the same household.

The case is the second to be confirmed in that region, and the fourth in Nunavut. The first case in the Kivalliq region was confirmed in Rankin Inlet on Wednesday, Nov. 11.

Since then, schools have remained closed in the Kivalliq and other restrictions have been put in place.

“As we see the numbers of COVID cases rising throughout Canada, it’s critical we maintain our public health measures, act with caution and pay strict attention to our actions,” Nunavut Premier Joe Savikataaq said in a news release.

“To everyone in the Kivalliq, please know we are with you, we’re sending you strength and our government is ready to help. Stay well and care for one another safely.”’

Anyone who has reason to believe they have been exposed to COVID-19 is advised to call the COVID-hotline at 1-888-975-8601 between 10 a.m. and 6 p.m. EST, or notify, but do not go in person to, their community health centre right away and immediately self-isolate at home for 14 days.

Individuals who have spent time at any of the isolation hubs should self-monitor for symptoms for 14 days after returning to the territory.

Share This Story

(9) Comments:

  1. Posted by Nunasick on

    Why don’t they test everyone at the isolation hubs? They do temperature checks, but that’s it. Why aren’t they testing when people get there and when they leave?

    • Posted by Steven Anaktak on

      All medical patients/ excorts isolating at the hubs Edmonton, Winnipeg, Ottawa and Montreal. I was wondering if they do get tested for covid before heading home and if they are isolating when they head to from those isolation hubs? It seems the covid spread is coming from those isolation hubs.

  2. Posted by Kitikmeot on

    Went to our Northern Store yesterday. SOME people were told to wear masks. But once inside, there was no social distancing, people hugging and kissing babies.
    There’s no way I’m going to the grocery store or the post office once the virus arrives here (if it isn’t already here!), “reduced hours” or not.

  3. Posted by hubs are meaningless on

    what’s the difference if they’re testing at the hubs if they are letting non-essential workers come into the territory without hubbing for 14 days? it’s not just essential employees they are letting come in without staying at a hub.

    • Posted by Nunasick on

      Those are two separate issues. It sounds like these particular travellers came from the travel hub. My question was not about essential workers or those who are bypassing the quantine hub for whatever reason, although I’d like to know if they are being tested when net come through, and if not, why not. My question is about those who are going through quarantine.

  4. Posted by Get ready on

    It’ll be everywhere soon enough. Get your masks ready folks.

    Mayor of iqaluit: if you could ask some of your councillors to tone it down with the facebook speculation and covid shaming that would be great. Qujanamiik.

  5. Posted by Paul Mikiyungiak on

    I wonder, if its better to have the isolation hubs in each community? That way, the money spent by GN stays in Nunavut.

    • Posted by Observation on

      That makes no sense at all and completely deletes the point of the isolation hub. The isolation hub is before the destination. You would be loading planes with people carrying Covid-19 with passengers flying around the regions who are not going into isolation because they are just travelling within the territory. Having separate flights for those going into isolation would not even be remotely feasible.

  6. Posted by Monty sling on

    Isolation hubs are doing fine in each of the three hub cities. Its just that some patients are drunkarks with no care of others but to themselves. To many are drunks and can’t control themselves. My community of arv is at no. 1 spot for carelessness.

Comments are closed.